Difference between revisions of "Paiste Sound Formula Reflector 16" Thin China"
m |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
'''Series:''' [[Paiste Sound Formula#Sound Formula Reflector|Sound Formula Reflector]]<br> | '''Series:''' [[Paiste Sound Formula#Sound Formula Reflector|Sound Formula Reflector]]<br> | ||
'''Weight:''' ?g<br> | '''Weight:''' ?g<br> | ||
| + | '''Median Weight:''' ?g (n=0)<br> | ||
'''Years of production:''' [[Paiste 1993 Expansion#Sound Formula Reflector|1993]] - [[Paiste 1996 Phase Out|1996]]<br> | '''Years of production:''' [[Paiste 1993 Expansion#Sound Formula Reflector|1993]] - [[Paiste 1996 Phase Out|1996]]<br> | ||
'''Sound file:''' unknown<br> | '''Sound file:''' unknown<br> | ||
Latest revision as of 01:20, 21 October 2024
Group: Chinas (and Swishes)
Type: Thin China
Size: 16 Inch
Series: Sound Formula Reflector
Weight: ?g
Median Weight: ?g (n=0)
Years of production: 1993 - 1996
Sound file: unknown
Paiste's Description: <<< - >>>
Review: "In the case of the Chinas, I think the quality level of the Paiste Sound Alloy is working against the cymbals. I've stated before that China cymbals from the expensive lines of most manufacturers don't sound very— well, Chinese. The trashy, abrasive sound of a China cymbal seems to be better produced by cheaper, less musical alloys. In the case of the SFR Chinas, they are high-pitched and clear, as would be expected from this line. But they don't have the washy, bottom-end, almost-broken characteristics that usually define the "Chinese" sound. So although the SFR Chinas were loud and clear, they wouldn't be my first choice in terms of acoustic authenticity."
Review written by Rick Van Horn ("Product Close-Up - Paiste Sound Formula Reflector Series And New Paiste Line Rides", Modern Drummer, May 1993, p. 37)
Artist/song where it can be heard: unknown
