Difference between revisions of "Z Zildjian 18" China Boy"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[File:Z Zildjian 18 China Boy 4.jpg|thumb|right|450px|]] | [[File:Z Zildjian 18 China Boy 4.jpg|thumb|right|450px|]] | ||
'''Group:''' [[Zildjian Types and Models#Chinas|Chinas]]<br> | '''Group:''' [[Zildjian Types and Models#Chinas|Chinas]]<br> | ||
| − | '''Type:''' [[Zildjian China | + | '''Type:''' [[Zildjian China|China Boy]]<br> |
'''Size:''' 18 Inch<br> | '''Size:''' 18 Inch<br> | ||
'''Series:''' [[Z Zildjian#Z Zildjian|Z Zildjian]]<br> | '''Series:''' [[Z Zildjian#Z Zildjian|Z Zildjian]]<br> | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
'''Years of production:''' 1987 - 1993<br> | '''Years of production:''' 1987 - 1993<br> | ||
'''Sound file:''' unknown <br> | '''Sound file:''' unknown <br> | ||
| − | '''Zildjian's Description:''' [[Zildjian China | + | '''Zildjian's Description:''' [[Zildjian China#Z Zildjian|<<< - >>>]]<br> |
'''Review:''' "As Zildjian states, these cymbals are louder and more powerful than other types of Chinas that I have heard, but the overall sound is more pleasing and not as overbearing as the usual "trashy" China sound. They are clearer and more cutting—less of the usual white-noise sound of China types. The length of decay is relatively short, with the 18" lasting a bit longer. I found that I could play busier ride patterns on the 20", and that the 18" worked better for loud punctuations and quarter-note-type ride patterns. Both cymbals worked very well in building the intensity and climaxing through the solo sections of songs I played with the band. <br> | '''Review:''' "As Zildjian states, these cymbals are louder and more powerful than other types of Chinas that I have heard, but the overall sound is more pleasing and not as overbearing as the usual "trashy" China sound. They are clearer and more cutting—less of the usual white-noise sound of China types. The length of decay is relatively short, with the 18" lasting a bit longer. I found that I could play busier ride patterns on the 20", and that the 18" worked better for loud punctuations and quarter-note-type ride patterns. Both cymbals worked very well in building the intensity and climaxing through the solo sections of songs I played with the band. <br> | ||
Basically, these are two of the best China cymbals I've heard. They sound great within the context of a rock band. Also, I was knocked out by their recorded sound. I realize that no two Zildjian cymbals are identical, but the basic properties of these cymbals should be similar. If you're thinking about adding a China-type to your set, be sure to check these out!"<br> | Basically, these are two of the best China cymbals I've heard. They sound great within the context of a rock band. Also, I was knocked out by their recorded sound. I realize that no two Zildjian cymbals are identical, but the basic properties of these cymbals should be similar. If you're thinking about adding a China-type to your set, be sure to check these out!"<br> | ||
Review written by William F. Miller ("Product Close-Up - New Cymbals", Modern Drummer, June 1987, p. 106)<br> | Review written by William F. Miller ("Product Close-Up - New Cymbals", Modern Drummer, June 1987, p. 106)<br> | ||
''' Artist/song where it can be heard:''' | ''' Artist/song where it can be heard:''' | ||
Revision as of 14:38, 18 July 2024
Group: Chinas
Type: China Boy
Size: 18 Inch
Series: Z Zildjian
Weight: 1765g, 1860g, 2018g
Years of production: 1987 - 1993
Sound file: unknown
Zildjian's Description: <<< - >>>
Review: "As Zildjian states, these cymbals are louder and more powerful than other types of Chinas that I have heard, but the overall sound is more pleasing and not as overbearing as the usual "trashy" China sound. They are clearer and more cutting—less of the usual white-noise sound of China types. The length of decay is relatively short, with the 18" lasting a bit longer. I found that I could play busier ride patterns on the 20", and that the 18" worked better for loud punctuations and quarter-note-type ride patterns. Both cymbals worked very well in building the intensity and climaxing through the solo sections of songs I played with the band.
Basically, these are two of the best China cymbals I've heard. They sound great within the context of a rock band. Also, I was knocked out by their recorded sound. I realize that no two Zildjian cymbals are identical, but the basic properties of these cymbals should be similar. If you're thinking about adding a China-type to your set, be sure to check these out!"
Review written by William F. Miller ("Product Close-Up - New Cymbals", Modern Drummer, June 1987, p. 106)
Artist/song where it can be heard:
