Difference between revisions of "Paiste 2002 17" Thin Crash"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
<div style="float:right">__TOC__</div> | <div style="float:right">__TOC__</div> | ||
| − | [[File:Paiste 2002 17 Thin Crash 1.jpg|thumb|right|250px| | + | [[File:Paiste 2002 17 Thin Crash 1.jpg|thumb|right|250px|2002 17" Thin Crash]] |
'''Group:''' [[Paiste Cymbal Type#Crashes|Crashes]]<br> | '''Group:''' [[Paiste Cymbal Type#Crashes|Crashes]]<br> | ||
'''Type:''' [[Paiste Thin_Crash|Thin Crash]]<br> | '''Type:''' [[Paiste Thin_Crash|Thin Crash]]<br> | ||
'''Size:''' 17 Inch<br> | '''Size:''' 17 Inch<br> | ||
| − | '''Series:''' [[Paiste 2002|2002]]<br> | + | '''Series:''' [[Paiste 2002#2002|2002]]<br> |
'''Weight:''' 1128g<br> | '''Weight:''' 1128g<br> | ||
'''Years of production:''' [[Paiste 2004 Expansion|2004]] - Present<br> | '''Years of production:''' [[Paiste 2004 Expansion|2004]] - Present<br> | ||
| − | '''Sound file:''' [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfhE3MwIXy8 | + | '''Sound file:''' [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfhE3MwIXy8 2002 17" Thin Crash]<br> |
| − | [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S53Sx646QZo | + | [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S53Sx646QZo 2002 17" Thin Crash]<br> |
| − | [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjJ8x3i1i8o | + | [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjJ8x3i1i8o 2002 17" Thin Crash]<br> |
| − | [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ivnw9dfN14 | + | [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ivnw9dfN14 2002 17" Thin Crash]<br> |
'''Paiste's Description:''' [[Paiste Thin_Crash#2002|<<< - >>>]]<br> | '''Paiste's Description:''' [[Paiste Thin_Crash#2002|<<< - >>>]]<br> | ||
'''Review:''' The 17" is very quick, and lower pitched than a regular 17" 2002 Crash. (would love to hear what a 17" Paper Thin 2002 Crash would sound like if this one is this quick) I couldn't recommend the 17" Thin as much as the 19" Thin for most applications, it's just a little too quick, and the light weight would be too much of a liability to many Rock drummers.<br> | '''Review:''' The 17" is very quick, and lower pitched than a regular 17" 2002 Crash. (would love to hear what a 17" Paper Thin 2002 Crash would sound like if this one is this quick) I couldn't recommend the 17" Thin as much as the 19" Thin for most applications, it's just a little too quick, and the light weight would be too much of a liability to many Rock drummers.<br> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
'''Review:''' This baby has a classic 2002 shimmer. It's really responsive and has a wide range of dynamics. Has a great sound, I'd give it 10/10. The only thing that I found a bit disturbing is thickness. It's really thin and if you play heavier music and hit hard, don't use this cymbal. I wonder how thin are 2002 Paperthin crashes if this one is so thin. Anyway, it does sound great, it is great and if you like the 2002 sound, you'll love this one.<br> | '''Review:''' This baby has a classic 2002 shimmer. It's really responsive and has a wide range of dynamics. Has a great sound, I'd give it 10/10. The only thing that I found a bit disturbing is thickness. It's really thin and if you play heavier music and hit hard, don't use this cymbal. I wonder how thin are 2002 Paperthin crashes if this one is so thin. Anyway, it does sound great, it is great and if you like the 2002 sound, you'll love this one.<br> | ||
Review written by Dado Denkovi<br> | Review written by Dado Denkovi<br> | ||
| − | '''Artist/song where it can be heard:''' | + | '''Artist/song where it can be heard:''' unknown |
Revision as of 10:13, 6 June 2019
Group: Crashes
Type: Thin Crash
Size: 17 Inch
Series: 2002
Weight: 1128g
Years of production: 2004 - Present
Sound file: 2002 17" Thin Crash
2002 17" Thin Crash
2002 17" Thin Crash
2002 17" Thin Crash
Paiste's Description: <<< - >>>
Review: The 17" is very quick, and lower pitched than a regular 17" 2002 Crash. (would love to hear what a 17" Paper Thin 2002 Crash would sound like if this one is this quick) I couldn't recommend the 17" Thin as much as the 19" Thin for most applications, it's just a little too quick, and the light weight would be too much of a liability to many Rock drummers.
Review written by Stranjluv101
Review: This baby has a classic 2002 shimmer. It's really responsive and has a wide range of dynamics. Has a great sound, I'd give it 10/10. The only thing that I found a bit disturbing is thickness. It's really thin and if you play heavier music and hit hard, don't use this cymbal. I wonder how thin are 2002 Paperthin crashes if this one is so thin. Anyway, it does sound great, it is great and if you like the 2002 sound, you'll love this one.
Review written by Dado Denkovi
Artist/song where it can be heard: unknown
